Deprecated: stripslashes(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/bjvgkuvc/mncguru.com/c.c.php on line 30

Deprecated: stripslashes(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/bjvgkuvc/mncguru.com/c.c.php on line 30

Deprecated: stripslashes(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/bjvgkuvc/mncguru.com/c.c.php on line 30

Deprecated: ucfirst(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/bjvgkuvc/mncguru.com/c.c.php on line 625
Topic : The New Drug Recall Lawyers by: Richard Martin Given the monstrous size and profitability of drug companies, some plaintiff lawyers are considering focusing more of their practice on drug litigation. In fact, shortly - mncguru.com Mobile app version of mncguru.com
Login or Join
RichardMartin

: The New Drug Recall Lawyers by: Richard Martin Given the monstrous size and profitability of drug companies, some plaintiff lawyers are considering focusing more of their practice on drug litigation. In fact, shortly

@RichardMartin

Posted in: #Legal #Vioxx #Recall #Drug #New #Article #Vioxx-Withdrawal #Media #Plaintiffs #Plaintiff #Withdr

The New Drug Recall Lawyers

by: Richard Martin


Given the monstrous size and profitability of drug companies, some plaintiff lawyers are considering focusing more of their practice on drug litigation. In fact, shortly after Merck's announcement of the Vioxx recall, some large plaintiff firms started aggressive media campaigns aimed at bringing in prescription drug injury victims. The media blitz has been non stop. Billboards, TV, web marketing, radio, and direct mail are just some of the marketing vehicles that attorneys have used to try and find new cases for them to work on. Many plaintiff law firms are no longer focusing on chasing run of the mill car accidents. Some of them have gone so far as to reposition themselves as “drug recall lawyers,” seeing that the future of their practice may be shaped by the initial outcome of these new pharmaceutical cases.
When Merck chose to withdraw Vioxx, the CEO stated that a voluntary recall was the responsible course of action. Prior to pulling Vioxx from the market, Merck was spending 0 Million per year on advertising Vioxx. Vioxx is classified as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or NSAID. However, Vioxx belongs to a new family of NSAIDs called “COX-2 inhibitors.” There are not many COX-2 inhibitors on the market in the US: Bextra and Celebrex may be the only other two.
Both the number of potential Vioxx plaintiffs and award amounts of the lawsuits are projected to be extremely large. The investment bank S.G. Cowan recently estimated that eventually more than 600,000 plaintiffs could file suit in the Vioxx case. Furthermore, some investment banks think that plaintiffs may file for more than Billion in damages in years to come. Even the national TV networks have covered the Vioxx withdrawal. A November 2004 story on the Vioxx withdrawal appeared on CBS News' 60 Minutes. The CBS story implied that the US Justice Department is conducting an investigation and the Securities and Exchange Commission is looking into Merck's conduct. Given the media coverage of the Vioxx withdrawal and the number of people who were prescribed Vioxx, there may be many new “Drug Recall Firms” founded in years to come.


best stocks under 100 TBR jar read books Money systematic investment planning cheers

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down

0 Reactions   React


Replies (0) Report

Login to follow topic

More posts by @RichardMartin

0 Comments

Sorted by best first Latest Oldest Best

Back to top | Use Dark Theme